Miley Cyrus’ attack of the SIDE BOOB! (PHOTOS)

Written by +

This is turning out to be the week of offensive body parts!

On Monday—thanks to Rihanna—we discussed the ‘wonder of the under boob.’ Is it sexy or is it trashy (with a capital WHITE). We received a mixed bag of responses. In general people seem to think the ‘under boob’ is one of the stupidest trends that fashion has ever seen.  But, in Rihanna’s particular case, she’s somehow able to pull it off (or at least not look as ridiculous as Sarah Jessica Parker or Sharon Stone).

On Tuesday—thanks to Lady Gaga—we investigated a possible fashion trend surfacing that involved ‘sheer panty hose over a thong’ (nada else on the bottom). That one was unanimously SHOT DOWN and was the #1 stupidest trend fashion we’ve EVER seen (although not necessary the worst from Gaga…remember the meat dress?)

Now, on Wednesday—thanks to a rapidly maturing Miley Cyrus—we shall examine the infamous ‘side boob.’ Miley has pushed this look far beyond its limit… so far, in fact, that we imagine her family being the “naked type.” You know, Billy Ray Cyrus, accidentally giving Miley’s slumber party girls the shock of their little lives, strolling down for the morning paper in his birthday suit. Or Miley’s mom wandering out of the shower and directly through movie night.

‘Side boobs’ as a whole, however, are not considered particularly offensive. They are more commonly sighted in Hollywood than the prior two figure-flaunting tactics—especially the leotard over tights look—which reminds us of mistakenly dressing that way as a kid for dance class. (Key word = mistakenly.)

Why do you think the 'side boob' is more common?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Tell us what you think.

There are no comments on this entry.

Add a Comment

Fill in the form and submit.